The Trial Of Karen Read | Justice For John O'Keefe

In "The Trial of Karen Read," listeners are drawn into a gripping courtroom drama unfolding around the mysterious death of John O'Keefe. This investigative series explores the intricate details of the trial of Karen Read, the woman accused of a crime that has captivated the nation. Each episode delves into the evidence presented, the witnesses' testimonies, and the legal strategies from both the defense and the prosecution. As the trial progresses, the podcast also examines the broader implications of the case, including its impact on the local community, the justice system, and the media. With expert commentary from legal analysts, interviews with key figures close to the case, and a deep dive into the social and psychological dimensions involved, this series seeks to uncover the truth behind the headlines and answer the question: Is there justice for John O'Keefe? Join us as we piece together the story, challenge preconceptions, and follow every twist and turn in this compelling search for justice.

Recent Episodes

Episodes loading...

Recent Reviews

mary sio

Garbage podcast

Zero investigation, zero objectivity - pass
Racheltexas70

Yes!!!!

Just tuned in and binge listening! I’ve been on the non popular side of this trial and find your coverage refreshing! Justice for John O’Keefe!
Noidtoday

Ridiculously biased

Title says it. So very biased, lacks critical thinking.
Drea368

Not enjoyable

What a mess. Not only is this pod biased - it’s also poorly done.
Kg71852!rev

Heavily biased

This might be a great program if you are not interested in anything objective and believe she’s guilty beyond a reasonable doubt?
Biased drivel

Injustice for John O'Keefe

This podcast is garbage. The hosts completely disregard the indisputable facts of the case and rely solely on their own interpretation of her actions. They purport to want justice for John O'Keefe but really just want to scapegoat Karen Read while failing to consider an alternate, more nefarious circumstance that led to his death. JOK would want his actual killer brought to justice.
Melinch

Terrible Host

So there’s this little thing in our cherished American values called “innocent until proven guilty” Perhaps the host forgot how we should treat the accused. 🤷‍♀️
MidgetLvr

Alan Jackson

I think AJ and KR are a little too close for comfort. I wonder if a relationship has developed. I know he’s married but that means nothing. There is also info online their marriage is in trouble and there’s a picture of him embracing Karen from behind outside a bar or restaurant. This would explain A LOT!
Rae#8

Abrasive

I tried to listen to this podcast as well as a couple of others pertaining to the Karen Read trial, as to hear opinions from both sides. I just can’t anymore with this one. I believe there is a way to express your feelings about something without all of the foul language, and without insulting people who don’t share your views…. Just my opinion, but this is one I can do without
Ashley Skov

Nope

Turned it off within 5 minutes. The sarcastic, insincere tone was all I needed to hear.
lalalandw1

Bored and annoyed

Too many ads and the host is hard to listen to, very full of himself and belittling of others with different opinions. Don’t waste your time.
HowKH

Immature analysis

Make a joke of whiteness’s testimony & find themselves comical. And they aren’t. Terribly immature
Mellitch

Karen read

So incredibly biased
01jax

Common sense

I’ll just start by saying I have been listening to the Karen Reid trials (plural) for the last several years now and there’s no doubt in my mind she did it!!! Thank goodness this podcast has common sense and sees it for what it is. I agree wholeheartedly, and will continue to listen. Thank you for your honest and true coverage. ⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️
dutchdan123987

Completely biased

I listen to three different podcasts about the Karen Reed trial one that is overly biased in favor of Karen Reed one which comes from the local news station and is objective and down the middle and reports on what happens and then the third is this clown. He is so clearly biased against Karen Reed and yet on occasion tries to portray himself as open minded. He much like the guy who is biased in favor of Karen Reed Only sees things through one simple lens. I only listen to balance off the podcast that is so overtly in favor of Karen Reed as it interests me how people can be so one way and only see things with blinders on that fits their narrative. This guy is terrible
ChelseaJ90

Day 23&24???

Did day 23 & 24 go on hiatus???? I don’t listen to anything but the trial on this podcast due to how annoying this guy’s voice is and how you can tell 1000% just how bias he is. I’ve been waiting for a few days for it and now all of a sudden day 25 is posted.
julnatina

Beyond extra

This guy…what a tool…the data is still in question and guess what…it keeps changing!! This guy is a big idiotic nothing burger
Davey__B

Shallow

Presented by a shallow thinker. Very biased and not worth my time
1Marley1

Only logical podcast about KR trial

Really a terrible podcast that posts some great content. Click bait titles and re-releasing material multiple times under different titles is awful. Also 10 minutes of adds at end are a pain and make you think you’re getting a decent 30 podcast when really only 15 minutes of content. HOWEVER!, it is the only podcast with logical thinking people talking about this case in some sort of sensical way. So thanks for that and keep it up.
Jordan Rozsa

Extremely biased

I’ve been looking for unbiased sources to hear updates on the trial and this clearly wasn’t it. They obviously hate Karen….They don’t even pretend to show multiple perspectives.
Ettereug

Garbage commentary

I’m an attorney and am enjoying listening to the actual trial but the commentary is baseless, biased and overall terrible and I stopped listening to it.
Podandcatlover

So biased

Well I thought I would like this pod for the Karen read trial but the host is so biased against her because of some ex of his. He constant discussion of his bipolar ex sounds more narcissistic than Karen read herself.
Disappointed94

One dimensional and pretentious

This is an obvious bias view of the trial and the hosts act as if they are intelligent, but come across as nothing but mouth breathing morons.
Ejb930

Extremely Biased Against Karen

This is not news. This is effectively propaganda for the prosecution. There is not one minute of this podcast that sounds impartial.
berrypimp44

hank brennans must be behind this garbage

extremely bias and i feel they didn’t represent how unqualified the states witnesses were. 17years to get a degree and you’re an expert?
Belly to Baby Photography

Just…No

It’s awful. I couldn’t even get through one episode. The bias and opinions on the case take over and take away from the situation as a whole. If you have your heart set on her guilt already - then this is your podcast! If you’re just wanting to hear the facts and form your own opinion - stay far away!
SilverTear8

Love It!

Great podcast. Love your analysis of all of the evidence. You are so right. It doesn’t matter what ridiculous finger pointing takes place or that Trooper Proctor was highly inappropriate. The evidence is there. Book her!
FarrahPK

Pls don’t clickbait us

I really like the podcast but as others have said, you rerelease the same clips over and over again. And, like today, description says you’re discussing something with guest and it’s completely different topic or just a random slice of larger conversation. Then 8 min of ads. Feels like you’re click baiting with descriptions.
BostonDee

Justice for John! JJ

Thank you for such a clear review of the expert testimony today! John O’Keefe broke up with KR on the way to Fairview and she was so angry and drunk and she backed up and gunned him down!! Her followers I believe are being paid so they don’t have to go to their jobs at Dunkin Donuts ie the pink shirts! Just like PDiddy who is paying 50 bucks a day to the Free Diddy campaign outside his court. I went to the cape and going over the Bourne Bridge there they were … it’s a weird cult for people who don’t want to work. I want justice for a good man. I don’t know John but he deserves justice
Jackson Monterey

Justice For John O’Keefe?

“Justice For John O’Keefe” would be investigating those who were inside the house and have gone to great lengths to destroy evidence in the wake of John’s death. Tony Bruschi’s podcast is so detached from reality, it reads like some weird Pro Cop Fan Fiction. Zero journalistic integrity from Tony on this one. If listeners are only getting case related news from this podcast, their understanding of the case will be based on fantasy not facts.
dlp789

Great Insights

It’s nice to listen to Tony’s podcast with facts and truth, and not not all the lies and conspiracies.
Oldpipster

Hit Piece Podcast

Idk who is funding this podcast but it is propaganda that should be forced to disclose it is not a legitimate source of news
Jennie525

Respectfully, We’re Watching Too

As someone who has been following the Karen Read trial closely—including watching the proceedings, listening to multiple podcasts (including this one), and researching the facts—I find it incredibly unfair and condescending for Jennifer Coffindaffer to claim that those in “Karen Read’s camp” are only relying on YouTube and drama. That kind of blanket statement discredits the many thoughtful, informed individuals who are making judgments based on the same evidence she is. Just because someone believes there may be a cover-up does not mean they aren’t critically evaluating the information. This kind of bias only undermines the credibility of the discussion. Listeners deserve more respect and balance, especially when the stakes are this high.
MNislistening

Yikes- odd take of the case and facts

Wow- stopped two of these episodes due to the bias takes on this re-trial. Wonder who the podcasters have connection to from the Common Wealth prosecution?
kgraff27

A painful listen

I’m not even a Karen Read fan and haven’t made up my mind on her guilt but this is NOT the place to get good recaps of the trial. I have listened to several podcasts and YouTube creators following the trial and this is by far the most biased and least credible. This guy is incredibly condescending and arrogant. He leaves out details and twists a lot of info to feed his bias. Honestly, he seems very hateful toward women. It was really jarring and odd to listen to after hearing a lot of people recapping by simply just delivering the details from the day without the immaturity that this guy used. I don’t usually leave reviews but wanted to warn people like me who are just looking to get the facts. Most of what you get from this guy is arrogance.
MichaelZAlex

Disappointment

Airs more repetitive low budget commercials than content, torture
bethanyJK32

Great Podcast

Tony is brilliantly funny and yet still full of common sense and analytical thinking. Great insight to the trial. It’s honest regardless whether people like the truth of not.
Spumph

Excellent

Great perspectives - I don’t agree with some of the feedback that it’s one-sided. Feels obvious this woman admitted to hitting the late John O’Keefe. It’s not a frame job - sorry for the true crime fans.
RI crime junkie

Prosecution’s witness

Extremely biased, only explains the prosecutions side and writes off any inconsistency in evidence/ doesn’t even state the defense’s argument.
Spod78

I like it!

While I agree there are waaaay too many ads, I just fast forward through them. Otherwise, this podcast is pretty entertaining. The host is definitely in the GUILTY camp but so am I so I’m fine with it. I agree with so many of the things he points out and I also enjoy listening to his guests. (Except Motta. He doesn’t take breath and forgets this isn’t his show!). If you think Karen is innocent, you definitely won’t like the podcast! 😆
KWW8

Why the repeats?

I really like your podcast and coverage of the cases but why do you keep re-releasing the same episodes? I get excited when I see a new episode drop but it turns out to be the same one I’ve listened to like 3 times.
Sa-La-Fo

Thank you!!!

Thank you for voicing the ridiculousness of all the tings Karen has said in interviews and documentaries!!! How do people not notice her behaviors are NOT NORMAL!! She has so many sympathizers and she shouldn’t! Her story has changed several times!! You can’t tell me 10 or more people can keep this secret and not cave. Give me a break.
Sdsh3234

Thank you

Bob motta “the science” smh. He sounds like the clowns who told us to wear masks and stand 6 feet apart. Everyone is bought and paid for these days. Karen has had the best defensive attorneys yet they can’t come up with any actual evidence pointing to an alternative. People tell you who they are. It’s pathetic how many people naturally back criminals. So much narcissism exists in our society. I’m a 30 year old female. Likely the only one that thinks she’s guilty
ATXK

Yikes

I enjoy true crime and have been following this trial. I’m not a Karen Read fan, nor do I know if she’s truly innocent or not. But this podcast presents incorrect and inaccurate information in order to prove that she’s guilty. It’s fine to have an opinion, but it’s irritating to hear them casually twisting the truth. It’s already tragic and dramatic enough.
Smigmish

Host is awful

I agree with others this host is biased and seems specifically biased against women, making sweeping judgement including presuming to diagnose the defendant with narcissism from his armchair. Thought this would be an interesting podcast to get more info on the case but it’s useless as well as infuriating.
betsy pinky

Biased and ridiculously dramatic

Please try harder.
Janabannnnna

Don’t listen if you wanna get 2 sides.

Read the review first very one side. Absolutely disgusting.
RickyEdwar

Wishy washy bias

Host will trick you to listen by saying there’s no case for murder 2, plenty of reasonable doubt but then he will claim there’s no there there and Karen is guilty. Brutal. Also half of the content is commercials.
Aphili

Really?

Biased. If you’re looking for just the facts, or even a balanced view, this isn’t it.
8members

Biased reporting

Extremely biased.